Can Engagement, Leadership and Culture Really Improve the Outcomes of a Business Exit?

All business owners live in the tension between people and profits. Often times it seems like these two aspects of our businesses can sometimes be in direct opposition to each other. It’s easy to feel like a $10K investment in our people is just a $10K reduction in profits. That people and profits are a zero-sum game, with one side winning and the other side losing. But I want to lay out some data for you and see what you think about how investing in your people could actually benefit you in the sale of your business.

Most companies operate from this mental framework:

Revenue – Variable costs – Fixed costs = Profit

In this scenario, fixed costs include things like building expenses, payroll, etc.

Most business owners assume that the best way to increase profit is to increase revenue and decrease variable costs (like COGS) and reduce fixed costs (like payroll).

This viewpoint is not entirely wrong, it just fails to take into account the human factor. We all know that people are the wild card in business. I often say “if it weren’t for people, business would be easy”. The people who work for you are not machines that can be dialed up to maximum efficiency from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. for the 261 working days a year. In fact, if your company is like the average company in the U.S. then only 30% of your employees are operating at full capacity. The term most commonly used for these employees who are connected to their work and are operating at their full potential is engagement. Employees who are operating somewhere below their full potential are referred to as disengaged or actively disengaged.

What if instead of 30% of your people operating at their full potential, 60% of the company was operating at full capacity? Do you think this would have a positive impact on the revenue and profitability of the organization?  

Well, let’s look at some numbers. According to the most recent data, disengaged employees have 37% higher absenteeism, 18% lower productivity and 15% lower profitability. When that translates into dollars, you're looking at the cost of 34% of a disengaged employee's annual salary, or $3,400 for every $10,000 they make.

 So think about it this way, the average salary in the U.S. is $47,000. If you are leaving 34% of that average employee’s productivity on the table due to low engagement you are losing close to $16,000 per-year per-employee. And that’s just for your average employees. If you apply that to your managers and higher-level employees working in the $80,000 salary range you are looking at over $27,000 in human capital (think payroll) waste per year. Not to mention that employees who work for disengaged managers are 4x more likely to be disengaged themselves. Take those numbers (somewhere between $16,000 and $27,000 per year) and multiply them by the number of employees you have working in your organization, and all of a sudden addressing the issues associated with a disengaged workforce becomes a top strategic priority. Especially when you consider that an extra dollar of sales is only equal to 50, 40, 30 cents or less contribution to your profits (after you take out taxes and COGS, etc.), but a dollar saved that you are already spending equals a full dollar of contribution to profits.

Just think about all of the potential things that you could be working on to increase the value of your business over the next 12-24 months and ask yourself where addressing engagement stacks up in comparison to all of the initiatives you have lined up for your exit. How much bottom-line impact could address any engagement, leadership and culture issues that might exist have on your business, even if you only recovered 50% of the human capital waste in your organization? And again this does not even account for the losses that you experience from employee turnover. In a study conducted in 2018, 52% of employees who left their company said their organization or their managers could have done something to keep them from leaving. Yet most employees who leave companies do so without ever having a real conversation with their managers or organizational leaders. This statistic indicates a huge gap in the trust that exists between most managers and employees. And by the way, one more stat. that might be interesting; 47% of an employee’s engagement in their work is driven by the strength of their relationship with their leader.

So what are the advantages of high employee engagement beyond just mitigating losses? According to Gallup, organizations that are the best at engaging their employees to achieve earnings-per-share growth that is more than four times that of their competitors. Compared with organizations in the bottom 25% of engagement, organizations in the top 25% of engagement realize substantially better customer satisfaction, higher productivity, better retention, fewer accidents, and 21% higher profitability. Engaged workers also report better health outcomes.

So what if by investing in your people with some of the profits you have now, you could improve their health and happiness, improve the efficiency of the payroll costs of your organization, and simultaneously see higher profits. This is what we call a positive-sum game. All parties win.

So the question is, do you think having a healthy team of employees makes your company more attractive to a potential buyer? Do you believe that a healthier workforce can really be more productive and profitable?  Do you think a healthier and more engaged workforce might improve the multiple of EBITDA that you receive at the sale of your business? How much would it be worth to you to gain an extra 1x of EBITDA?

So as you prepare to move toward the next chapter in the life of your business I encourage you to challenge the way you think. I challenge you to consider the potential impact of investing in the engagement levels of your employees, the development of your managers and leaders, and solidifying your organizational culture. Do you think of these as costs that will decrease your profitability, or as investments that will ultimately create positive outcomes, both for you and for your employees?

——————————————————————-

Guest Blogger Alan Kemper holds a BS in Management from Georgia Tech, a MBA from Auburn University, a Doctorate of Business Administration from George Fox University and a Lean Six Sigma Blackbelt from Georgia Tech. He is the President of LEAD Workforce Consulting and speaks and consults regularly on the power of engagement, leadership and culture on organizational outcomes.

Contact us today and ask about our Surveys for Work and Well-Being and Values In Action.

Dr. Alan Kemper

Dr. Alan Kemper, DBA and his team of coaches have years of collective leadership experience in multiple industries, across various disciplines and around the world.

In addition to Alan’s work with LEAD, he works full-time as a business professor at Point University where he teaches primarily in the fields of management, leadership, continuous improvement, organizational change and economics. Alan received his BS in Management from the Georgia Institute of Technology, his MBA from Auburn University, and his Doctorate in Business Administration from George Fox University.