Can Engagement, Leadership and Culture Really Improve the Outcomes of a Business Exit?

All business owners live in the tension between people and profits. Often times it seems like these two aspects of our businesses can sometimes be in direct opposition to each other. It’s easy to feel like a $10K investment in our people is just a $10K reduction in profits. That people and profits are a zero-sum game, with one side winning and the other side losing. But I want to lay out some data for you and see what you think about how investing in your people could actually benefit you in the sale of your business.

Most companies operate from this mental framework:

Revenue – Variable costs – Fixed costs = Profit

In this scenario, fixed costs include things like building expenses, payroll, etc.

Most business owners assume that the best way to increase profit is to increase revenue and decrease variable costs (like COGS) and reduce fixed costs (like payroll).

This viewpoint is not entirely wrong, it just fails to take into account the human factor. We all know that people are the wild card in business. I often say “if it weren’t for people, business would be easy”. The people who work for you are not machines that can be dialed up to maximum efficiency from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. for the 261 working days a year. In fact, if your company is like the average company in the U.S. then only 30% of your employees are operating at full capacity. The term most commonly used for these employees who are connected to their work and are operating at their full potential is engagement. Employees who are operating somewhere below their full potential are referred to as disengaged or actively disengaged.

What if instead of 30% of your people operating at their full potential, 60% of the company was operating at full capacity? Do you think this would have a positive impact on the revenue and profitability of the organization?  

Well, let’s look at some numbers. According to the most recent data, disengaged employees have 37% higher absenteeism, 18% lower productivity and 15% lower profitability. When that translates into dollars, you're looking at the cost of 34% of a disengaged employee's annual salary, or $3,400 for every $10,000 they make.

 So think about it this way, the average salary in the U.S. is $47,000. If you are leaving 34% of that average employee’s productivity on the table due to low engagement you are losing close to $16,000 per-year per-employee. And that’s just for your average employees. If you apply that to your managers and higher-level employees working in the $80,000 salary range you are looking at over $27,000 in human capital (think payroll) waste per year. Not to mention that employees who work for disengaged managers are 4x more likely to be disengaged themselves. Take those numbers (somewhere between $16,000 and $27,000 per year) and multiply them by the number of employees you have working in your organization, and all of a sudden addressing the issues associated with a disengaged workforce becomes a top strategic priority. Especially when you consider that an extra dollar of sales is only equal to 50, 40, 30 cents or less contribution to your profits (after you take out taxes and COGS, etc.), but a dollar saved that you are already spending equals a full dollar of contribution to profits.

Just think about all of the potential things that you could be working on to increase the value of your business over the next 12-24 months and ask yourself where addressing engagement stacks up in comparison to all of the initiatives you have lined up for your exit. How much bottom-line impact could address any engagement, leadership and culture issues that might exist have on your business, even if you only recovered 50% of the human capital waste in your organization? And again this does not even account for the losses that you experience from employee turnover. In a study conducted in 2018, 52% of employees who left their company said their organization or their managers could have done something to keep them from leaving. Yet most employees who leave companies do so without ever having a real conversation with their managers or organizational leaders. This statistic indicates a huge gap in the trust that exists between most managers and employees. And by the way, one more stat. that might be interesting; 47% of an employee’s engagement in their work is driven by the strength of their relationship with their leader.

So what are the advantages of high employee engagement beyond just mitigating losses? According to Gallup, organizations that are the best at engaging their employees to achieve earnings-per-share growth that is more than four times that of their competitors. Compared with organizations in the bottom 25% of engagement, organizations in the top 25% of engagement realize substantially better customer satisfaction, higher productivity, better retention, fewer accidents, and 21% higher profitability. Engaged workers also report better health outcomes.

So what if by investing in your people with some of the profits you have now, you could improve their health and happiness, improve the efficiency of the payroll costs of your organization, and simultaneously see higher profits. This is what we call a positive-sum game. All parties win.

So the question is, do you think having a healthy team of employees makes your company more attractive to a potential buyer? Do you believe that a healthier workforce can really be more productive and profitable?  Do you think a healthier and more engaged workforce might improve the multiple of EBITDA that you receive at the sale of your business? How much would it be worth to you to gain an extra 1x of EBITDA?

So as you prepare to move toward the next chapter in the life of your business I encourage you to challenge the way you think. I challenge you to consider the potential impact of investing in the engagement levels of your employees, the development of your managers and leaders, and solidifying your organizational culture. Do you think of these as costs that will decrease your profitability, or as investments that will ultimately create positive outcomes, both for you and for your employees?

——————————————————————-

Guest Blogger Alan Kemper holds a BS in Management from Georgia Tech, a MBA from Auburn University, a Doctorate of Business Administration from George Fox University and a Lean Six Sigma Blackbelt from Georgia Tech. He is the President of LEAD Workforce Consulting and speaks and consults regularly on the power of engagement, leadership and culture on organizational outcomes.

Contact us today and ask about our Surveys for Work and Well-Being and Values In Action.

Can Engagement, Leadership and Culture Really Improve the Outcomes of a Business Exit?

All business owners live in the tension between people and profits.

Often times it seems like these two aspects of our businesses can sometimes be in direct opposition to each other. It’s easy to feel like a $10K investment in our people is just a $10K reduction in profits. That people and profits are a zero-sum game, with one side winning and the other side losing. But I want to lay out some data for you and see what you think about how investing in your people could actually benefit you in the sale of your business. 

Most companies operate from this mental framework:

Revenue – Variable costs – Fixed costs = Profit

In this scenario, fixed costs include things like building expenses, payroll, etc.

Most business owners assume that the best way to increase profit is to increase revenue and decrease variable costs (like COGS) and reduce fixed costs (like payroll). 

This viewpoint is not entirely wrong, it just fails to take into account the human factor. We all know that people are the wild card in business. I often say “if it weren’t for people, business would be easy”. The people who work for you are not machines that can be dialed up to maximum efficiency from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. for the 261 working days a year. In fact, if your company is like the average company in the U.S. then only 30% of your employees are operating at full capacity. The term most commonly used for these employees who are connected to their work and are operating at their full potential is engagement. Employees who are operating somewhere below their full potential are referred to as disengaged or actively disengaged.

What if instead of 30% of your people operating at their full potential, 60% of the company was operating at full capacity? Do you think this would have a positive impact on the revenue and profitability of the organization?  

Well, let’s look at some numbers. According to the most recent data, disengaged employees have 37% higher absenteeism, 18% lower productivity and 15% lower profitability. When that translates into dollars, you're looking at the cost of 34% of a disengaged employee's annual salary, or $3,400 for every $10,000 they make.

 So think about it this way, the average salary in the U.S. is $47,000. If you are leaving 34% of that average employee’s productivity on the table due to low engagement you are losing close to $16,000 per year per employee. And that’s just for your average employees. If you apply that to your managers and higher-level employees working in the $80,000 salary range you are looking at over $27,000 in human capital (think payroll) waste per year. Not to mention that employees who work for disengaged managers are 4x more likely to be disengaged themselves. Take those numbers (somewhere between $16,000 and $27,000 per year) and multiply them by the number of employees you have working in your organization, and all of a sudden addressing the issues associated with a disengaged workforce becomes a top strategic priority. Especially when you consider that an extra dollar of sales is only equal to 50, 40, 30 cents or less contribution to your profits (after you take out taxes and COGS, etc.), but a dollar saved that you are already spending equals a full dollar of contribution to profits. 

Just think about all of the potential things that you could be working on to increase the value of your business over the next 12-24 months and ask yourself where addressing engagement stacks up in comparison to all of the initiatives you have lined up for your exit. How much bottom-line impact could address any engagement, leadership, and culture issues that might exist have on your business, even if you only recovered 50% of the human capital waste in your organization? And again this does not even account for the losses that you experience from employee turnover. In a study conducted in 2018, 52% of employees who left their company said their organization or their managers could have done something to keep them from leaving. Yet most employees who leave companies do so without ever having a real conversation with their managers or organizational leaders. This statistic indicates a huge gap in the trust that exists between most managers and employees. And by the way, one more stat. that might be interesting; 47% of an employee’s engagement in their work is driven by the strength of their relationship with their leader. 

So what are the advantages of high employee engagement beyond just mitigating losses? According to Gallup, organizations that are the best at engaging their employees achieve earnings-per-share growth that is more than four times that of their competitors. Compared with organizations in the bottom 25% of engagement, organizations in the top 25% of engagement realize substantially better customer satisfaction, higher productivity, better retention, fewer accidents, and 21% higher profitability. Engaged workers also report better health outcomes. 

So what if by investing in your people with some of the profits you have now, you could improve their health and happiness, improve the efficiency of the payroll costs of your organization, and simultaneously see higher profits? This is what we call a positive-sum game. All parties win. 

So the question is, do you think having a healthy team of employees makes your company more attractive to a potential buyer? Do you believe that a healthier workforce can really be more productive and profitable?  Do you think a healthier and more engaged workforce might improve the multiple of EBITDA that you receive at the sale of your business? How much would it be worth to you to gain an extra 1x of EBITDA?

So as you prepare to move toward the next chapter in the life of your business I encourage you to challenge the way you think. I challenge you to consider the potential impact of investing in the engagement levels of your employees, the development of your managers and leaders, and solidifying your organizational culture. Do you think of these as costs that will decrease your profitability, or as investments that will ultimately create positive outcomes, both for you and for your employees?

——————————————————————-

Guest Blogger Alan Kemper holds a BS in Management from Georgia Tech, an MBA from Auburn University, a Doctorate of Business Administration from George Fox University, and a Lean Six Sigma Blackbelt from Georgia Tech. He is the President of LEAD Workforce Consulting and speaks and consults regularly on the power of engagement, leadership, and culture on organizational outcomes. 

Contact us today and ask about our Surveys for Work and Well-Being and Values In Action.  

LEADERSHIP DURING A CRISIS: Leadership, Engagement and Culture

How do we lead employees in times such as these? Even without a global pandemic, leading employees can be a challenge that requires much time and energy. But now, in addition to trying to lead well, you are trying to keep your business afloat in a way that you have never had to do in the past. No doubt these are difficult times to be a business owner. The following are a few tips to strengthen your Leadership, Employee Engagement, and Culture in the midst of this crisis.  

Golf Bag Leadership

The first area of focus is Leadership. Invest a few minutes right now and assess your current leadership “style.” You may at times be democratic or a delegator, a pace-setter, or any other number of styles, but more than likely you have a “go-to” style. The recommendation is to move away from a singular style or “golf club” during this time of crisis and instead think of your leadership as a “golf bag” carrying different leadership styles for various situations.

In the great game of golf, you want to select the right club once you have assessed the lay of the ball, the distance, and various other factors. The same should be true for our leadership styles. For most of us, the lay of the ball has shifted — our environment has changed dramatically in the midst of this crisis. You need to now feel empowered to “select a different club” or style than you normally would because everything happening is unprecedented. That might mean you are a lot more directive and commanding in your leadership style for the sake of saving the company. Communicate this shift in your leadership style to your people. It certainly will not be like this forever, but this is how we will survive today. As a leader, you have the freedom to change that style in order to combat the present circumstances.

Your Employees’ Connection With You Drives Their Engagement

The second focus area is Employee Engagement. In the best of times, when employees are engaged, research shows that it leads to higher profitability, productivity, customer satisfaction, and lower turnover. An engaged employee gives their discretionary effort and goes well above and beyond what is required of them. That’s important during normal times—now, it is essential. As a leader, you have been pouring into employees, paying their salaries, and showing up for them. Now is not the time to abandon those duties. Your employees are on the same boat that you are on. You must step out onto the deck and continue to engage with them as you’re all fighting for the same thing; you all want your ship to stay afloat. This is crucial because we know that 47% of an employee’s connectedness to their work is directly correlated to the connectedness they feel to their leader. Therefore, in whatever bandwidth you have, you must make an effort to continue to connect and engage with your employees.

Culture Is Forged In Times Like These

The last area of focus is Culture. Organizations with strong cultures consistently outperform organizations with weaker cultures.  Culture is simply the values, beliefs, and experiences that a group of people demonstrate and enjoy collectively. In these unprecedented times, our values and beliefs are being tested, and new experiences are being created. Most importantly, your people’s beliefs about you as a leader and your company are being solidified.  As leaders, it is crucial that we step up right now and demonstrate intentionality in shaping those experiences. This will be a defining moment in the history of our country and your company. Your people are judging you and your response to it.  It is essential to respond well.

Summary

·       Feel free to lead differently. These are different times.

·       Engage with your employees. They need you and you need them.

·       Be intentional about your company culture. We will get past this and when we do, your employees will remember how you responded.

I wish you all the best. If there is some way I can help you avoid damaging your human capital as we get through this very difficult season of business, please call me and I’ll be happy to share openly with you.

Alan Kemper, DBA

678.346.1186

Alan@LEADWorkforce.com